Aprils
Buzz:
THE
THIRD ACT: GO OUT WITH A BANG
(Copyright 2004)
by
Kathryn McCullough
A
strong third act can make the difference between a pass and a
recommend from a reader. A reader who is leaning towards passing
will be won over by a powerful resolution that makes earlier problems
seem less daunting to fix. Conversely, a reader who is on the
fence will be put off by weak, corny, or contrived final scenes.
The problems listed below are some of those found in scripts that
did not make the grade.
Unresolved
subplots
As
with the magic disappearing major characters mentioned in last
months essay, writers often introduce subplots in the first
or second acts that ultimately arent as necessary as the
writer initially thought. This is fine for a first draft. However,
in rewriting, it is important to hone in on the important throughlines
and cut out the extraneous ones. Subplots that are underdeveloped
but essential need to be woven in throughout the script and resolved
either by the end of the second act or in the third act. Often
these lost subplots have to do with the personal backstory
of the protagonist and dont have an integral connection
to the action of the plot. If a personal backstory is important,
such as a female cops problems with her ex-husband over
child support, find a way for this issue to impact on the cops
ability to deal with her job or on some other aspect of the plot.
No
character arc
A
character arc is an important part of a dramatic story. The best
screenplays revolve around characters who are affected by the
experiences they undergo during the course of the plot. With rare
exceptions, every successful movie has a lead character who changes
in some way. Even pure action films and gross-out comedies contain
at least slight arcs. Characters who evolve are more emotionally
compelling and give a film story more resonance and meaning: the
audience feels that they, like the character, have learned something
by the end. The arc does not need to be for the better. A naïve
character may end up cynical; an honorable man may end up corrupted.
Sudden
or unbelievable character arcs
While
character arcs are important, writers often try to tag them on
at the very end. A bully suddenly realizes the error of his ways.
The guy who cant commit suddenly realizes that he loves
his girlfriend and wants to marry her. However, in order for the
change to be believable and satisfying, it needs to be built up
to throughout the story. Every sequence of the second act should
have an effect on the character and take him one step closer to
this ultimate transformation. This way, the final step will feel
inevitable rather than forced. Make sure that the potential for
this change is present from the beginning, and dont feel
that every major character needs to see the light. Some people
are not redeemable, and it is fine to leave some of the supporting
characters still trapped by dysfunction at the end of the script.
Deus
ex machina
This
term comes from Greek plays, in which the actor playing a god
would literally be hoisted down from above to save the day. This
convenient solution to a dramatic situation or crisis was acceptable
in ancient times, but today it comes across like a cheat. A deus
ex machina does not need to be a literal person; it can
simply be an overly contrived, easy solution. A killer cannot
suddenly confess simply because a cop has confronted him. No character
should win the lottery or inherit a fortune in the third act unless
the possibility for this has been set up in the first act.
While
your third act should flow naturally from the second act, it is
worthwhile to treat it as a separate entity, and put as much effort
into it as you have into the whole script. In order for an ending
to be satisfying, and more important, powerful, it needs to be
earned. This requires conflict, tension, and characters overcoming
extreme obstacles to get the results they are hoping for. The
more difficult the solution is to come by, the greater the tension,
and the more affected your reader and later your audience will
be.